We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which fluctuate depending to the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case legislation citation in a very state court is probably not suitable, or perhaps accepted, with the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed down below have experienced opinions filed for them within the last fourteen times. The following information is accessible for Just about every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, together with signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), clearly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion requires a shift to a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, around the other hand, supplies financial relief by inserting an employee inside of a higher pay out scale, without shifting their career duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained within the same shell out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they lack possibilities for promotion. Upgradation can be a policy Device used to reduce the hardship of very long-term stagnation. Read more
As the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed because of the Constitution and laws from the United States and this State.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be effectively-settled that though thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to look at the advantage of each of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates who are found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part of your respondent department.
Summaries provide an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and guidelines targeted at safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set from the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
eight. For your reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds here the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend from the comments, and their request is So acceded to. All pending applications, if any, will also be dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is additionally a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.